For release notes since edk2-stable202508, see:
https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/releases/tag/edk2-stable202511
This commit also updates the edk2-platforms packages with the last
commit merged at the edk2 release date (2025-11-19), which corresponds
to commit [1].
The edk2-non-osi package is also updated the same way, which
corresponds to commit [2].
This commit also adds an edk2-platforms package patch to fix a Marvell
build failure seen with the SolidRun MacchiatoBin platform.
This commit has been runtime tested with tests using EDK2 package,
with commands:
support/testing/run-tests \
-d dl -o output_folder \
tests.boot.test_edk2 \
tests.boot.test_grub.TestGrubAArch64EFI \
tests.boot.test_grub.TestGrubRiscV64EFI \
tests.boot.test_grub.TestGrubX8664EFI \
tests.package.test_fwts
It has also been runtime tested (by booting in qemu) with defconfigs
using EDK2 package:
qemu_aarch64_sbsa_defconfig
qemu_loongarch64_virt_efi_defconfig
qemu_riscv64_virt_efi_defconfig
qemu_x86_64_efi_defconfig
[1] 1e64c1109a
[2] 94d0489811
Cc: Dick Olsson <hi@senzilla.io>
Cc: Romain Naour <romain.naour@smile.fr>
Cc: Vincent Stehlé <vincent.stehle@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Julien Olivain <ju.o@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Romain Naour <romain.naour@smile.fr>
Upstream is dead, website unreachable, and the use case in 2026 is
dubious, so drop the package.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Analysis of https://rg42.org/gitweb/?p=dbustriggerd.git:
last commit: 2014
Musl libc 1.2.5 removed the definition of the basename() function from
string.h and only provides it in libgen.h as the POSIX standard
defines it.
Instead of fixing an unmaintainted package we remove it from buildroot,
no other package depends on it.
Fixes:
https://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/811/81170fe89e1f5b70c63657684de43175e621f762/
dbus-triggerd.c:150:27: error: implicit declaration of function 'basename' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
150 | argv[argc++] = strdup(basename(handler_cmd));
Signed-off-by: Bernd Kuhls <bernd@kuhls.net>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
The CVS project is no longer maintained upstream. It no longer builds
with GCC 14.x, has been failing to build for months in our
autobuilders with nobody caring about it.
We managed to fix the GCC 14.x build issue, then there are GCC 15.x,
some of them fixed by Debian patches, but some not. Overall, this is
too much effort, while upstream is completely dead.
So let's get rid of cvs entirely.
Fixes:
https://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/59f6e77106ac98535688ff5b9392b0b3ad3041ae/
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Bernd Kuhls <bernd@kuhls.net>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
The criu package was added in Nov 2023, and then bumped once in
December 2023. Since then, it has never been bumped again, and all
follow-up fixes were provided by other people than the original
package submitter listed in the DEVELOPERS file.
criu has seen several upstream releases since then, and most notably
is causing a number of build issues in our autobuilders:
https://autobuild.buildroot.net/?reason=criu-3.19
The package was never updated to those newer upstream releases, and
the autobuilder issues have not been addressed.
Therefore, let's drop this package.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Bernd Kuhls <bernd@kuhls.net>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
gconf has not seen any release since 2013, and the last commit in
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Archive/gconf is from 2015.
The package example application basic-gconf-app fails to build with a
recent compiler such as GCC 14.x:
basic-gconf-app.c:458:60: error: passing argument 1 of ‘gtk_dialog_get_content_area’ from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
It is not entirely clear since when this breakage takes place, but
most likely since GCC 14.x was introduced. This issue can be
reproduced including on 2025.02.x with the following defconfig:
BR2_aarch64=y
BR2_TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL=y
BR2_TOOLCHAIN_EXTERNAL_BOOTLIN=y
BR2_PACKAGE_MESA3D=y
BR2_PACKAGE_MESA3D_GALLIUM_DRIVER_SWRAST=y
BR2_PACKAGE_MESA3D_OPENGL_EGL=y
BR2_PACKAGE_MESA3D_OPENGL_ES=y
BR2_PACKAGE_LIBGTK3=y
BR2_PACKAGE_GCONF=y
However, for the build issue to happen you need to run:
$ make libgtk3
$ make
So that libgtk3 gets built before gconf. Indeed, there's a hidden
dependency between the two, and the example programs of gconf only get
build if libgtk3 is built before. We've however encountered the
problem in a (real) bigger build where the dependency relationship of
packages have caused libgtk3 to get built before gconf.
Note that we could perhaps have fixed the problem by disabling the
examples, but gconf is anyway so old and deprecated that it isn't
worth the effort.
There are no known autobuilder issues.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Bernd Kuhls <bernd@kuhls.net>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
This package is no longer maintained, no release since 2005, and it
has build issues as it uses too old XML APIs:
/home/thomas/projets/buildroot/output/host/bin/../aarch64-buildroot-linux-gnu/sysroot/usr/include/libxml2/libxml/SAX.h:18:4: warning: #warning "libxml/SAX.h is deprecated" [-Wcpp]
18 | #warning "libxml/SAX.h is deprecated"
| ^~~~~~~
svgint.h:42:9: error: unknown type name 'xmlParserCtxtPtr'
42 | typedef xmlParserCtxtPtr svg_xml_parser_context_t;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Fixes:
https://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/895fdba2f3fcaa42aa93946f2532351d39b16647/
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Bernd Kuhls <bernd@kuhls.net>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
This package is no longer maintained, no release since 2005, and its
dependency libsvg has build issues as it uses too old XML APIs:
/home/thomas/projets/buildroot/output/host/bin/../aarch64-buildroot-linux-gnu/sysroot/usr/include/libxml2/libxml/SAX.h:18:4: warning: #warning "libxml/SAX.h is deprecated" [-Wcpp]
18 | #warning "libxml/SAX.h is deprecated"
| ^~~~~~~
svgint.h:42:9: error: unknown type name 'xmlParserCtxtPtr'
42 | typedef xmlParserCtxtPtr svg_xml_parser_context_t;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Bernd Kuhls <bernd@kuhls.net>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
In version 2.0.0 Linux support was removed:
https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-announce/2025-August/003624.html
"This mouse driver is primarily used with BSD, GNU Hurd, illumos, &
Solaris systems. Linux systems should instead use either xf86-input-
libinput or xf86-input-evdev.
While versions 1.9.5 and earlier had rudimentary support for Linux as
well, that has been removed in this release."
Alternative packages can not be selected due to udev dependencies.
Signed-off-by: Bernd Kuhls <bernd@kuhls.net>
[Julien: add extra info in Config.in.legacy comment]
Signed-off-by: Julien Olivain <ju.o@free.fr>
Because the way JavaScript project development is working the chances that your
project is using the same version of the buildroot package, and you provide
this library from `/var/www` to your users is actually really low ...
If you want to bundle JavaScript libraries in your project you should probably
either use a cdn, handle the package version and location of your choice in
your external or overlay, or just bundle it in your assets from a NPM workflow
to benefit from some minifications from your bundler.
Historically many of those JavaScript libraries were added in the 2010 eras
where it could make sense for them to be part of Buildroot.
Most of them are also way outdated/not maintained.
For more informations see https://elinux.org/Buildroot:DeveloperDaysELCE2025
Signed-off-by: Thomas Perale <thomas.perale@mind.be>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Because the way JavaScript project development is working the chances that your
project is using the same version of the buildroot package, and you provide
this library from `/var/www` to your users is actually really low ...
If you want to bundle JavaScript libraries in your project you should probably
either use a cdn, handle the package version and location of your choice in
your external or overlay, or just bundle it in your assets from a NPM workflow
to benefit from some minifications from your bundler.
Historically many of those JavaScript libraries were added in the 2010 eras
where it could make sense for them to be part of Buildroot.
Most of them are also way outdated/not maintained.
For more informations see https://elinux.org/Buildroot:DeveloperDaysELCE2025
Signed-off-by: Thomas Perale <thomas.perale@mind.be>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Because the way JavaScript project development is working the chances that your
project is using the same version of the buildroot package, and you provide
this library from `/var/www` to your users is actually really low ...
If you want to bundle JavaScript libraries in your project you should probably
either use a cdn, handle the package version and location of your choice in
your external or overlay, or just bundle it in your assets from a NPM workflow
to benefit from some minifications from your bundler.
Historically many of those JavaScript libraries were added in the 2010 eras
where it could make sense for them to be part of Buildroot.
Most of them are also way outdated/not maintained.
For more informations see https://elinux.org/Buildroot:DeveloperDaysELCE2025
Signed-off-by: Thomas Perale <thomas.perale@mind.be>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Because the way JavaScript project development is working the chances that your
project is using the same version of the buildroot package, and you provide
this library from `/var/www` to your users is actually really low ...
If you want to bundle JavaScript libraries in your project you should probably
either use a cdn, handle the package version and location of your choice in
your external or overlay, or just bundle it in your assets from a NPM workflow
to benefit from some minifications from your bundler.
Historically many of those JavaScript libraries were added in the 2010 eras
where it could make sense for them to be part of Buildroot.
Most of them are also way outdated/not maintained.
For more informations see https://elinux.org/Buildroot:DeveloperDaysELCE2025
Signed-off-by: Thomas Perale <thomas.perale@mind.be>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Because the way JavaScript project development is working the chances that your
project is using the same version of the buildroot package, and you provide
this library from `/var/www` to your users is actually really low ...
If you want to bundle JavaScript libraries in your project you should probably
either use a cdn, handle the package version and location of your choice in
your external or overlay, or just bundle it in your assets from a NPM workflow
to benefit from some minifications from your bundler.
Historically many of those JavaScript libraries were added in the 2010 eras
where it could make sense for them to be part of Buildroot.
Most of them are also way outdated/not maintained.
For more informations see https://elinux.org/Buildroot:DeveloperDaysELCE2025
Signed-off-by: Thomas Perale <thomas.perale@mind.be>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Because the way JavaScript project development is working the chances that your
project is using the same version of the buildroot package, and you provide
this library from `/var/www` to your users is actually really low ...
If you want to bundle JavaScript libraries in your project you should probably
either use a cdn, handle the package version and location of your choice in
your external or overlay, or just bundle it in your assets from a NPM workflow
to benefit from some minifications from your bundler.
Historically many of those JavaScript libraries were added in the 2010 eras
where it could make sense for them to be part of Buildroot.
Most of them are also way outdated/not maintained.
For more informations see https://elinux.org/Buildroot:DeveloperDaysELCE2025
Signed-off-by: Thomas Perale <thomas.perale@mind.be>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Because the way JavaScript project development is working the chances that your
project is using the same version of the buildroot package, and you provide
this library from `/var/www` to your users is actually really low ...
If you want to bundle JavaScript libraries in your project you should probably
either use a cdn, handle the package version and location of your choice in
your external or overlay, or just bundle it in your assets from a NPM workflow
to benefit from some minifications from your bundler.
Historically many of those JavaScript libraries were added in the 2010 eras
where it could make sense for them to be part of Buildroot.
Most of them are also way outdated/not maintained.
For more informations see https://elinux.org/Buildroot:DeveloperDaysELCE2025
Signed-off-by: Thomas Perale <thomas.perale@mind.be>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Because the way JavaScript project development is working the chances that your
project is using the same version of the buildroot package, and you provide
this library from `/var/www` to your users is actually really low ...
If you want to bundle JavaScript libraries in your project you should probably
either use a cdn, handle the package version and location of your choice in
your external or overlay, or just bundle it in your assets from a NPM workflow
to benefit from some minifications from your bundler.
Historically many of those JavaScript libraries were added in the 2010 eras
where it could make sense for them to be part of Buildroot.
Most of them are also way outdated/not maintained.
For more informations see https://elinux.org/Buildroot:DeveloperDaysELCE2025
Signed-off-by: Thomas Perale <thomas.perale@mind.be>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Because the way JavaScript project development is working the chances that your
project is using the same version of the buildroot package, and you provide
this library from `/var/www` to your users is actually really low ...
If you want to bundle JavaScript libraries in your project you should probably
either use a cdn, handle the package version and location of your choice in
your external or overlay, or just bundle it in your assets from a NPM workflow
to benefit from some minifications from your bundler.
Historically many of those JavaScript libraries were added in the 2010 eras
where it could make sense for them to be part of Buildroot.
Most of them are also way outdated/not maintained.
For more informations see https://elinux.org/Buildroot:DeveloperDaysELCE2025
Signed-off-by: Thomas Perale <thomas.perale@mind.be>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Because the way JavaScript project development is working the chances that your
project is using the same version of the buildroot package, and you provide
this library from `/var/www` to your users is actually really low ...
If you want to bundle JavaScript libraries in your project you should probably
either use a cdn, handle the package version and location of your choice in
your external or overlay, or just bundle it in your assets from a NPM workflow
to benefit from some minifications from your bundler.
Historically many of those JavaScript libraries were added in the 2010 eras
where it could make sense for them to be part of Buildroot.
Most of them are also way outdated/not maintained.
For more informations see https://elinux.org/Buildroot:DeveloperDaysELCE2025
Signed-off-by: Thomas Perale <thomas.perale@mind.be>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Because the way JavaScript project development is working the chances that your
project is using the same version of the buildroot package, and you provide
this library from `/var/www` to your users is actually really low ...
If you want to bundle JavaScript libraries in your project you should probably
either use a cdn, handle the package version and location of your choice in
your external or overlay, or just bundle it in your assets from a NPM workflow
to benefit from some minifications from your bundler.
Historically many of those JavaScript libraries were added in the 2010 eras
where it could make sense for them to be part of Buildroot.
Most of them are also way outdated/not maintained.
For more informations see https://elinux.org/Buildroot:DeveloperDaysELCE2025
Signed-off-by: Thomas Perale <thomas.perale@mind.be>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Because the way JavaScript project development is working the chances that your
project is using the same version of the buildroot package, and you provide
this library from `/var/www` to your users is actually really low ...
If you want to bundle JavaScript libraries in your project you should probably
either use a cdn, handle the package version and location of your choice in
your external or overlay, or just bundle it in your assets from a NPM workflow
to benefit from some minifications from your bundler.
Historically many of those JavaScript libraries were added in the 2010 eras
where it could make sense for them to be part of Buildroot.
Most of them are also way outdated/not maintained.
For more informations see https://elinux.org/Buildroot:DeveloperDaysELCE2025
Signed-off-by: Thomas Perale <thomas.perale@mind.be>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Due to the increasing number of patches applied for this package and the
lack of updates to fix the build issues as well as updating the version
to newer release. This patch removes softether from buildroot package
list.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Perale <thomas.perale@mind.be>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
The rpi-userland package no longer builds with CMake >= 4. While
fixing it is probably not too difficult,
https://github.com/raspberrypi/userland tells us:
"""
This repo is ancient and deprecated.
It largely contains code using proprietary APIs to interface to the
VideoCore firmware. We have since move to standard linux APIs.
V4L2, DRM/KMS and Mesa are the APIs you should be using.
The few useful tools from here (dtoverlay, dtmerge, vcmailbox,
vcgencmd) have been moved to the raspberrypi/utils repo.
Code from here is no longer installed on latest RPiOS Bookworm images.
If you are using code from here you should rethink your solution.
Consider this repo closed.
"""
Hence it is time to drop this package from Buildroot.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Julien Olivain <ju.o@free.fr>
As we're about to remove the rpi-userland package, drop support for it
from package/gstreamer/gst1-plugins-base.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Julien Olivain <ju.o@free.fr>
This tool has been removed from upstream rpi-firmware, so drop the
corresponding option and logic in rpi-firmware.mk.
The tool has been removed by upstream commit
d1fcc26038186aecc1501a0b749833300afba801 ("opt: Remove builds of
deprectated userland tools").
It is Buildorot commit
28e6953ba8 ("package/rpi-firmware: bump
version to 5476720") that did a bump to a version of rpi-firmware that
no longer provided vcdbg.
Cc: Köry Maincent <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>
Cc: Gaël PORTAY <gael.portay@rtone.fr>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Julien Olivain <ju.o@free.fr>
6d188cb199
"This project is archived. QJson was originally created when Qt3 and Qt4
lacked robust JSON support.
Since Qt5, JSON support is included in the native Qt library SDK, making
this project obsolete."
The package is broken with cmake 4 and no other package depends on it.
Signed-off-by: Bernd Kuhls <bernd@kuhls.net>
Cc: Zoltan Gyarmati <mr.zoltan.gyarmati@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
